RE: [RFC] mpc5200 device tree bindings refinement

=20

-----Original Message-----
From: glikely@gmail.com [mailto:glikely@gmail.com] On Behalf=20
Of Grant Likely
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 2:44 PM

[snip]

I'm not too concerned about the name of this property.  It's pretty
much SoC specific regardless.  Every time a new soc is rolled, there
will be differences in how the frequency properties are interpreted.
In this case, this is not the external clock frequency, but rather the
internal frequency derived from the external clock.  I thought it best
to name the property after the actual signal name (fsystem).  Maybe it
would be best to rename this to "fsl,system-frequency" or
"fsl,fsystem-frequency"

I think "fsl,fsystem-frequency" is good.  It is clear that it is
not a general soc property and identifies a specific clock.

Stuart