Re: lanana: Add major/minor entries for PPC QE UART devices
From: Timur Tabi <hidden>
Date: 2007-02-28 17:51:46
Also in:
lkml
From: Timur Tabi <hidden>
Date: 2007-02-28 17:51:46
Also in:
lkml
Dan Malek wrote:
I'd shoot that down, too. Using udev in an embedded, reliable environment is very troublesome. Although, products I've developed using more than 4 UARTs had some custom /dev work done to it just to get everything mapped. My only concern is we don't add a new range for QE UARTs, that we use the same minors for both CPM and QE.
Then it appears that the only possible solution is to assign numbers 46 - 53 to the CPM/QE and accept that it overlaps with the Altix. Is everyone okay with that? -- Timur Tabi Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale