Re: 82xx CPU features
From: Kumar Gala <hidden>
Date: 2007-01-30 22:36:01
On Jan 30, 2007, at 4:31 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:quoted
For _CAN_NAP, I'm guessing its historic, maybe Dan knows why it wasn't set. What happens if you try to set it? Are there implications at the system level with regards to _CAN_NAP?Just tested: set CPU_FTR_MAYBE_CAN_DOZE for 82xx, CONFIG_BDI_SWITCH is not defined, echoed 1 to /proc/sys/kernel/powersave-nap - and a 8241 still runs... I'll try to measure if there's any difference in power consumption:-))quoted
I'm looking at the CPU_FTR_PPC_LE it varies if we should use _PPC_LE vs _TRUE_LE (or whatever the other one is called).
It would be good for someone to test an 8260 class (826x, 8272, etc..) to see if they have any issues. - k