Re: [RFC/PATCH 14/16] MPIC MSI backend
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2007-01-26 20:42:35
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 23:43 -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 07:34:16PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:quoted
MPIC MSI backend. Based on code from Segher, heavily hacked by me. Renamed to mpic_htmsi, as it only deals with MSI over Hypertransport....quoted
+ /* FIXME should we save the existing type */ + set_irq_type(virq, IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING);What exactly does the "virq" represent here? I'd like to understand if the FIXME comment could be dropped (or not). I don't get the impression it's related to a PCI IRQ line. Maybe irq_create_mapping() has comments that describe hwirq and virq? If not, it would be useful if those terms were described.
Well, this is a ppc specific backend, so I'm not sure we need to describe in there the way ppc interrupts work but heh ;-) Basically, on powerpc nowadays, we disconnect "linux" irqs (virtual irqs) and "hardware" irq numbers. linux irqs are allocated dynamically and bound to a given PIC/hw irq pair via irq_create_mapping() or one of the other superset of that function. In the case of something like the MPIC MSI backend, we first allocate a HW vector (we have a bitmap of free vectors), then we map it to a new virq with irq_create_mapping(). I think the FIXME is not needed. Ben.