On Jan 24, 2007, at 5:51 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 03:06:54PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
quoted
This will be required by the u-boot compatibility code to obtain a
compatible bd_t layout, to determine how to calculate the
timebase, and
to know what soc fields need to be modified.
Erm.. I believe the omission of *all* kernel header files from the
boot wrapper code, including the config, is a deliberate decision.
The idea is that the wrapping can, if necessary, be done independent
of the kernel build.
I think the problem is how to resolve the variations of the u-boot/
ppcboot bd_t that changes from board to board and based on config.
- k