Re: [PATCH] atomic_dec_if_positive sign extension fix
From: Gabriel Paubert <hidden>
Date: 2007-01-15 08:56:09
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 10:09:42AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Robert Jennings writes:quoted
Please apply for 2.6.20. If an atomic counter is explicitly set to a negative value the atomic_dec_if_positive function will decrement and store the next smallest value in the atomic counter contrary to it's intended operation.[snip]quoted
__asm__ __volatile__( LWSYNC_ON_SMP "1: lwarx %0,0,%1 # atomic_dec_if_positive\n\ + extsw %0,%0\n\ addic. %0,%0,-1\n\ blt- 2f\n" PPC405_ERR77(0,%1)NAK: Good fix for 64-bit, but it will break 32-bit. I think a better fix would be to use a cmpwi after the lwarx, and use addi rather than addic..
Indeed, this will also fix the bug that 0x8000000 is considered positive since the test was done after the decrement, at the cost of one additional instrucction in 32 bit mode. It also avoids clobbering the carry, you don't know whether a future version of GCC will require explicit clobbers for the carry. For now they are useless: you can specify "xer" in the clobber list AFAIR but no pattern can be split between setters and users of the carry in the machine description. Gabriel