-----Original Message-----
From: 
linuxppc-dev-bounces+joakim.tjernlund=transmode.se@ozlabs.org 
[mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+joakim.tjernlund=transmode.se@ozl
abs.org] On Behalf Of Joakim Tjernlund
Sent: den 5 januari 2007 14:20
To: 'Kumar Gala'
Cc: 'linuxppc-dev'
Subject: RE: latest linux git doesn't compile ucc_geth_phy.c 
and ucc_geth.c

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org] 
Sent: den 18 december 2006 19:44
To: Timur Tabi
Cc: Joakim Tjernlund; 'linuxppc-dev'
Subject: Re: latest linux git doesn't compile ucc_geth_phy.c 
and ucc_geth.c


On Dec 18, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:

quoted

Joakim Tjernlund wrote:

quoted

quoted

I've tested these on an 8360EMDS, and Kumar has reviewed and
signed off on the
code, so I think they're good.  Please let me know if 

they're not.

quoted

quoted

quoted

Has these been sent upstream yet? Didn't se them in 

linux tree as  

quoted

quoted

quoted

of now.

I posted the patches to the linuxppc-dev and netdev mailing 

lists.   

quoted

At this
point, these patches are at the whim of Paul M. and/or 

Jeff G. for  

quoted

quoted

merging.
Since the holidays are upon us, I'm not surprised that 

things are  

quoted

quoted

taking longer
than normal.

There really at the whim of Jeff G. since they are 

completely driver  

quoted

related.  I pinged Jeff G. to hopefully pick them up and push them  
for 2.6.20.

I do think these has been forgotten.

 Jocke

These are still not in linus tree. Tried to ping Jeff/netdev a couple of times
but nothing yet. Can't you push these via Paulus tree instead as Jeff seems to
be doing other things?

The actual patches are here:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2006-December/029247.html
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2006-December/029248.html

 Jocke