Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 3 authors, 2007-01-08

Re: [BUG] flash failure with CONFIG_RTAS_FLASH=m

From: Michael Ellerman <hidden>
Date: 2007-01-08 01:09:04

On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 18:04 -0600, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:49:51 -0600 Nathan Lynch [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The problem doesn't happen if CONFIG_RTAS_FLASH=y.

What's the best way to fix this?  Should rtas_firmware_flash_list be
defined in some non-modular code and exported?
Makes sense to me.

You could allocate it dynamically really early (i.e. lmb_alloc) since
that's the only allocator that we can give limits to where in the
address range it can allocate. It seems to be overkill in this case
though, it's just a page worth of data.
There's the ZONE stuff, but it doesn't help us because our ZONE_DMA ==
all of ram - we'd need to add another ZONE below that, which is generic
code :/

cheers

-- 
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab

wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help