Re: [PATCH/RFC 2.6.21 2/5] ehca: ehca_uverbs.c: "proper" use of mmap
From: Christoph Raisch <hidden>
Date: 2007-01-12 12:25:44
Also in:
lkml
Roland Dreier wrote on 11.01.2007 20:54:58:
> > int ehca_mmap(struct ib_ucontext *context, struct vm_area_struct
*vma)
> > {
>
> Can you split this monster routine into individual functions for
> each type of mmap please? With two helpers to get and verify thecq/qp
> shared by the individual sub-variants, that would also help to get rid > of all those magic offsets. > > Actually, this routine directly comes from ib_device.mmap - Roland, > can you shed some light on what's going on here? Each userspace-accessible IB device gets a single device node like /dev/infiniband/uverbsX. Opening that gives userspace a "context". One of the things userspace can do with that fd is mmap() on it -- that was originally envisioned as a way to map a page of hardware registers directly in to the userspace process. It seems ehca needs to allocate lots of different things in the kernel via mmap(). What you're saying I guess is that ideally each of these would be mmap() on a different fd rather than using different offsets. It's a little awkward to open multiple device nodes to get multiple fds, since there's not a good way to attach them all to the same context. I guess we could create some hack to return more file handles, but I think that cure is worse than the disease of using magic offsets... Maybe longer term we need to look at a scheme like cell's spufs but I'm still not confident we have the RDMA interface quite ready to freeze at the system call level. - R.
...as Roland mentions, we're not completely free to change the filehandle usage, it's shared by ~5 drivers now. I'd say lets investigate the direction of an own filesystem unless there's no other clean solution. We can polish the current version a bit, but that won't change the "magic offsets". Roland, could you take this patchset into your tree? We hope it adresses the major security concern and vm_insert_page. We're preparing the next patch for the yield deadlock topic with this patchset as prereq. Gruss / Regards . . . Christoph Raisch