Re: PPC440GX ethernet oddities
From: Jeff Mock <hidden>
Date: 2006-11-27 22:21:25
Eugene Surovegin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 09:34:59AM -0800, Jeff Mock wrote:quoted
# ./ethtool -S eth0 NIC statistics: rx_packets: 683430611 rx_bytes: 45405076316 tx_packets: 1331225622 tx_bytes: 2005276384145 rx_packets_csum: 683428670 tx_packets_csum: 1331224150 tx_undo: 0 rx_dropped_stack: 80 rx_dropped_oom: 0 rx_dropped_error: 0 [lots more 0's...] The number of checksum errors seems okay and doesn't really change when I plug in the second network connection, but the ring buffer usage still increases dramatically.Stats look OK. BTW, tx/rx_packets_csum is not a number of checksum errors, that's a number of packets where driver used hw checksum acceleration :).
Ah, silly me. Can you tell me where I can find the number of received packets with bad ethernet checksums? I'm still thinking that I might have a little hardware problem that is increasing the bit error rate when I use both ports, ultimately increasing my buffer utilization. thanks, jeff