Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 2 authors, 2006-11-27

Re: PPC440GX ethernet oddities

From: Jeff Mock <hidden>
Date: 2006-11-27 22:21:25


Eugene Surovegin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 09:34:59AM -0800, Jeff Mock wrote:
quoted
# ./ethtool -S eth0
NIC statistics:
     rx_packets: 683430611
     rx_bytes: 45405076316
     tx_packets: 1331225622
     tx_bytes: 2005276384145
     rx_packets_csum: 683428670
     tx_packets_csum: 1331224150
     tx_undo: 0
     rx_dropped_stack: 80
     rx_dropped_oom: 0
     rx_dropped_error: 0
     [lots more 0's...]

The number of checksum errors seems okay and doesn't really change when
I plug in the second network connection, but the ring buffer usage still
increases dramatically.
Stats look OK.  BTW, tx/rx_packets_csum is not a number of checksum 
errors, that's a number of packets where driver used hw checksum 
acceleration :).
Ah, silly me.  Can you tell me where I can find the number of received
packets with bad ethernet checksums?  I'm still thinking that I might
have a little hardware problem that is increasing the bit error rate
when I use both ports, ultimately increasing my buffer utilization.

thanks,
jeff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help