Re: [PATCH] Xilinx UART Lite 2.6.18 driver
From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Date: 2006-10-13 07:23:01
From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Date: 2006-10-13 07:23:01
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"David" == David H Lynch [off-list ref] writes:
Hi, David> Nobody has given me a reason yet why the UartLite should David> init different from the 8250, and absent a reason, I would David> mimic the 8250. I do not think there is reason for a different David> routing name. The ml403 8250 init code deals with multiple David> 8250's, I did the same with UartLite. 8250 is not the only serial driver. I think the reason why 8250 uses it's own struct is simple that it's a really old driver. Newer drivers like atmel_serial.c also uses the platform bus. David> I am not sure I did nto follow everything on linux-serial - David> but I think Peter was asked to remove support for additional David> uarts. I am not sure why. Remove support? I don't remember anything about that. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard