Thread (4 messages) flat view 4 messages, 3 authors, 2006-10-13

plb_temac, ML403, linux 2.4.26, EDK 7.1

From: robert corley <hidden>
Date: 2006-10-11 16:21:31

Some background:=0A    ML403 devel board=0A    EDK 7.1=0A    compilation of=
 reference design xapp902, modified to use linux and without loopback=0A   =
 use of linux_2_4_devel obtained from montavista via rsync=0A=0AI am trying=
 to use the plb_temac rather than the ll_temac.  In the long run, I'd prefe=
r to stick with linux 2.4.  In addition, I will need to get both embedded E=
MAC's up and running, but first I just wanna get the xapp902 working.  Also=
, I will need gigE support.=0A=0ASo, right now I am trying to get the plb_t=
emac to compile and get errors about the defines XPAR_XTEMAC_* within the l=
inux directories ../drivers/net/xilinx_enet.  I see that the edk gets the d=
efines within the xparameters.h file of the xapp902 project.  I also see th=
at my C:\EDK\sw\ThirdParty\bsp\linux_mvl31_v1_01_a\drivers don't have anyth=
ing for a plb_temac.=0A=0AQ:    Is my error related to an incorrect setup o=
f the linux or with the EDK?=0A=0AQ:    t is stated that the plb_temac driv=
ers are in EDK 8.1.  Can I stick=0Awith 7.1 or must I ugprade?=0A=0AQ:    W=
here in the linux tree should I look for the xtemac=0Astuff?  Is this what =
the EDK pushes on to the tree or is it released=0Awithin the MVL distro?=0A=
=0AQ    Based on posts by David and Ming, it=0Aappears that I must use xili=
nx_gige to get up to gigE speeds.  Will the=0Aplb_temac support this data r=
ate and, if so, is this a transparent=0Asupport or do I need to go the rout=
e suggested to Ming and=0Aoverwrite files in xilinx_enet?=0A=0AR. Corley=0A=
=0A=0A=0A=0A
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help