Hello.
Vitaly Wool wrote:
Hello Kumar,
quoted
This makes sense to me since we are just increasing kernel code size
for code we would never use for an FSL_BOOKE part if we do it the
other way. I dont think its that much more messy with the ifdef's.
Okay, if you're fine with this patch, is it possible that you include it
into your tree?
quoted
If you want to do the other cleanup as well I've got no issue with
that, but we really should NOT build in support for 7450 into a
FSL_BOOKE kernel when reasonably avoidable.
That's fine with me.
As of the cleanups, well... looks to me some more patches will follow
soon, kinda bugfixing ones rather than cleanups first :)
The most funny/stupd thing is that the patch existed since May but it never
went in:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=5531
Thanks,
Vitaly
WBR, Sergei