Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)
From: matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr>
Date: 2006-10-08 08:56:39
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-fbdev, linux-ide, linux-pm, netdev
From: matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr>
Date: 2006-10-08 08:56:39
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-fbdev, linux-ide, linux-pm, netdev
Hi, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc1 compared to 2.6.18 that are not yet fixed Linus' tree. If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch of you was declared guilty for a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way possibly involved with one or more of these issues. Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering.
Subject : ueagle-atm Oops References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/6/390 Submitter : Ernst Herzberg [off-list ref] Handled-By : Matthieu Castet [off-list ref] Status : unknown
Guilty : http://www.kernel.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=e7ccdfec087f02930c5cdc81143d4a045ae8d361 Patch available at https://mail.gna.org/public/ueagleatm-dev/2006-10/msg00022.html , but some cleaning is need (I wasn't aware of "USB: fix __must_check warnings in drivers/usb/atm/" patch). Matthieu