Re: Correct way to format spufs file output.

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

On Friday 20 October 2006 15:54, Dwayne Grant McConnell wrote:

quoted

I think %0xllx is the way to go. I would even advocate changing 
signal1_type and signal2_type unless it is actually too dangerous.

There is absolutely no reason why these should be hexadecimal, they
are basically implementing a bool.

quoted

Is there even a case where changing from %llu to %0xllx would break things? 
Perhaps with the combination of a old library with a new kernel?

Right, a library or some script that has been written assuming there
is no leading 0x.

Okay. Thanks for considering it. I'll leave the %llu as is.

-- 
Dwayne Grant McConnell [off-list ref]
Lotus Notes Mail: Dwayne McConnell [Mail]/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Lotus Notes Calendar: Dwayne McConnell [Calendar]/Austin/IBM@IBMUS