Thread (6 messages) flat view 6 messages, 4 authors, 2006-08-14

Re: [RFC] Adding MTD to device tree

From: Segher Boessenkool <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-12 18:48:20

quoted
quoted
I would prefer to call them something different in the device tree.
The name 'mtd' is very specific to Linux, but the device tree
is a more generic concept.
    "Memory type devices" are specific to Linux? Doubt it. :-)
The name "mtd" is.
    In fact, device type "flash" sounds too restrictive.
But we can't call it "memory", that one is taken already.
quoted
'm with your suggestion for device_type and model, but not
compatable.   "physmap"?  What kind of device is that?  A
    Directly mapped NOR flash or ROM I think.
So use "flash" and "rom" as device_type (and as name, heh).
quoted
appropriate.   Physmap is the name of another linux driver.
    And the role of the "compatible" prop is exactly to help OS in  
selecting
the driver.
But it *cannot* do that by just naming the driver.  Not every OS
calls this driver "physmap", you know.


Segher
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help