Re: [RFC] New target 'cuImage' - compatibility uImage

In message [ref] you wrote:

Though it will need more space, the increase won't be too much as
wrapper and FDT should be very small.  The benefit is that kernel can
be extract directly to it's destination(address 0), rather than
extract to another place and then move it there.  A classical
time/space tradeoff.

You probably cannot expect a perfect solution when  retrofitting  new
features  into  an  old  system  (this  we should keep in mind: we're
talking about old U-Boot versions only, not  about  current  versions
which will support DT).


BTW: Another option is using U-Boot's multifile image format...

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
That said, there may be good reasons for what you did beyond obsequi-
ous sycophantic parody. Perhaps you might be so kind as to elucidate.
         -- Tom Christiansen in [off-list ref]