Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2006-07-31

Re: [PATCH] Add rtas_set_indicator_fast() for RTAS call without extended delay

From: Nathan Lynch <hidden>
Date: 2006-07-31 04:38:24

Paul Mackerras wrote:
Haren Myneni writes:
quoted
+	WARN_ON(rc == -2 || (rc >= 9900 && rc <= 9905));
This worries me... do we know for sure that RTAS will never return a
busy code?  If it could possibly return a busy code, and we can't
sleep, then we should spin doing the call again and again until it
works, I think.
The PAPR marks certain RTAS calls as "fast", meaning they must not
return any kind of busy status.  Manipulating the GIQ (set-indicator
with token 9005) is defined as "fast".
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help