Re: AltiVec in the kernel
From: Kumar Gala <hidden>
Date: 2006-07-20 13:22:59
On Jul 20, 2006, at 7:31 AM, Matt Sealey wrote:
quoted
But perhaps, in principle, couldn't one run four independent streams in parallel? Thus, for example, on an SSL-enabled web server, one could service multiple encryption/decryption threads at once. In practice, I don't beleive the infrastructure for that kind of parallelism is in place. I'm struggling to find a reason to develop that kind of infrastructure. Mumble something about Cell.If not AltiVec there is potential to use some features which come with AltiVec like the data stream functionality. Or even the standard PPC cache control stuff would work. What's the case in the kernel for the memcpy functions etc., are they optimized for doing things like longword copies rather than byte-per-byte etc.? We found glibc sucked for that.
Matt, can I ask what exactly you are trying to accomplish? There is a lot of work put into the kernel to ensure things are optimized. I'd say far more so than gets put into user space. - k