Re: OSS driver removal, 2nd round
From: Adrian Bunk <hidden>
Date: 2006-07-01 23:12:18
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:21:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Now that I've sent the first round of actually removing the code for OSS
drivers where ALSA drivers without regressions exist for the same
hardware, it's time for a second round amongst the remaining drivers.
Removing OSS drivers where ALSA drivers for the same hardware exists has
two reasons:
1. remove obsolete and mostly unmaintained code
2. get bugs in the ALSA drivers reported that weren't previously
reported due to the possible workaround of using the OSS drivers
The list below divides the OSS drivers into the following three
categories:
1. ALSA drivers for the same hardware
2. ALSA drivers for the same hardware with known problems
3. no ALSA drivers for the same hardware
My proposed timeline is:
- 2.6.18: let the drivers under 1. in the list below depend on
OSS_OBSOLETE_DRIVER
- 2.6.20: remove the options depending on OSS_OBSOLETE_DRIVER
- 2.6.22: remove the code for the drivers that were depending on
OSS_OBSOLETE_DRIVER from the kernel tree
...
2. ALSA drivers for the same hardware with known problems
DMASOUND_PMAC
- Olaf Hering regarding regressions in SND_POWERMAC:
Some tumbler models work only after one plug/unplug cycle of
the headphone. early powerbooks report/handle the mute settings
incorrectly. there are likely more bugs.
...
Could anyone tell me whether there are still regressions in ALSA
compared to DMASOUND_PMAC, and if yes give me bug numbers in the
ALSA BTS so that I can track them?
TIA
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed