Clement Fabien wrote:
Hi,
Some results: alignments are now respected but it seems that the method
I took from linux 2.4 is more efficient in terms of memory consumption.
I will provide a complete patch today with the same mechanism for
rh_alloc_fixed.
Fabien
Please don't bother.
The other method messes up the deallocations, you just have to live
with the wasted space.
With rh_alloc_fixed you're suppossed to know your alignment, the align
argument is bogus.
Pantelis