Re: Q: signed vs unsigned char, PPC vs x86 gcc 3.3.5 compiler differences
From: Hollis Blanchard <hidden>
Date: 2005-10-03 02:22:21
On Oct 2, 2005, at 9:11 PM, Bob Brose wrote:
If I change the declaration of atest to a signed char on PPC I get the same result as x86. Does this mean the char in x86 is signed and in PPC it's unsigned? Has it always been thus?
Yes, and yes. If it matters to you, you should explicitly use "signed char" or "unsigned char"... -Hollis