RE: Wall clock accuracy
From: Rune Torgersen <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-09 16:57:06
-----Original Message----- From: Eugene Surovegin [mailto:ebs@ebshome.net]=20 Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 11:41 Hmm, if I'm correct this clock drift (130ppm) should be=20 handled easily=20 by NTPD without stepping clock but with slewing. This is why NTPD=20 exists in the first place, so I don't see any reason to change=20 the kernel.
NTPD probably handles this correct, but I would like the time to be correct anyways. In our case we might not always have access to a ntpd server, and our input clock is very accurate to begin with.