Re: RFC: proposed arch/powerpc directory structure

On Aug 11, 2005, at 6:19 PM, Tom Rini wrote:

On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 06:07:03PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
[snip]

quoted

I think this causes confusion.  the reason we suggested pq2 and
classic32 was to handle things like sandpoint.  Sandpoint would live
in classic32.  The confusion partial comes from the fact that we can
run 8240/1/5 on a Sandpoint.  The thinking was everything that was
6xx/7xx/74xx + things like 8240/1/5 which can be thought of as 603 +
10x bridge would be classic32.

Thanks for the explanation.  But I think this is overkill for the
sandpoint or true like a sandpoint (Zynx something, Willow, neither of
which are in the kernel tree).  I think we can field the "I wanna hack
on my Sandpoint/8240, but don't see the code under 82xx/!"  
question. :)

So where do you suggest Sandpoint goes in this directory structure?

- kumar