RE: boot time scheduling hile atomic

Any patch forthcomming soon?=20

-----Original Message-----
From: linuxppc-dev-bounces@ozlabs.org=20
[mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces@ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of=20
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 16:29
To: Takeharu KATO
Cc: linuxppc-dev list
Subject: Re: boot time scheduling hile atomic
=20
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 23:07 +0900, Takeharu KATO wrote:

quoted

Hi Benjamin:
=20
I can not figure out why my previous patch is more preferable than
later one.
Could you explain the reason of that please.

=20
There may be other kernel bits calling syscall, it sounds saner to
always make sure we don't reschedule when in atomic (though=20
it's dubious
that it's allowed to do syscalls in atomic regions, let's be safe
there).
=20
In fact, we are thinking about consolidating the syscall=20
return path and
the normal irq return path like we did on ppc64.
=20
Ben.
=20
=20
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
=20
=20