I'll try to see if I can build a kernel to use on a pegasos box to test=20=
out the avec side tomorrow.
- kumar
On Mar 31, 2005, at 2:15 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 01:10:44PM -0700, Matt wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:34:21AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:26:18AM -0700, Wade Farnsworth wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 12:30, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 01:43:11PM -0500, Jason McMullan=20
wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 10:06 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > > > > > Can you build your patch for the lopec_defconfig and fix=20=
the errors
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
associated with enabling altivec.
> > > > > >
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Looks like you need to include asm/offset.h & asm/page.h=20=
in vector.S,
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
however there is another build error after that.
> > > > >
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Thanks! That also found a linking bug, fixed in this patch..=20=
Please
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
double check the call in 'AltiVecUnavalible' in head.S, and=20=
the re-load
> > > > > of 'ctr' at the end of load_up_altivec, as I do not have an=20=
AltiVec
> > > > > machine here.
> > > >
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
No dice:
> > > > VFS: Mounted root (nfs filesystem) readonly.
> > > > Freeing unused kernel memory: 100k init 4k prep
> > > > floating point used in kernel (task=3Dc03816b0, pc=3Dc000d664)
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Doing some objdump'ing, that's the start of load_up_altivec.
Hi Jason and Tom,
> > >
quoted
quoted
quoted
Has there been any more progress on this patch?
> >
quoted
quoted
Sadly no.=A0 We got to the point where it was reliably crashing on =
my
quoted
quoted
LoPEC (7400), but no time to try and fix it.=A0 The problem should=20=
show up
> > on any classic PPC box..
>
quoted
If nobody has time to work on this, then I intend=A0 to put Wade's=20=
440EP
> support in as is (actually, he's planning on resubmitting with some
> additional changes).=A0 When somebody has time, they can redo the=20=
patch
quoted
against that.
That's a good point to bring up.=A0 Jason, do you want to post your
current version to the list and we can try and see if we can get it
workign right?
--=20
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded