Re: [PATCH 1/3] PPC440EP SoC and Bamboo board support

[PATCH 1/3] PPC440EP SoC and Bamboo board support · Wade Farnsworth <hidden> · 2005-03-15
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PPC440EP SoC and Bamboo board support · Eugene Surovegin <hidden> · 2005-03-15
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PPC440EP SoC and Bamboo board support · Wade Farnsworth <hidden> · 2005-03-15
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PPC440EP SoC and Bamboo board support · Jason McMullan <hidden> · 2005-03-15
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PPC440EP SoC and Bamboo board support · Wade Farnsworth <hidden> · 2005-03-15
Re: [PATCH 2/3] PPC440EP: ibm_emac phy mode bug fix · Wade Farnsworth <hidden> · 2005-03-15
Re: [PATCH 3/3] PPC440EP IBM EMAC support · Wade Farnsworth <hidden> · 2005-03-15
Re: [PATCH 3/3] PPC440EP IBM EMAC support · Eugene Surovegin <hidden> · 2005-03-15
Re: [PATCH 3/3] PPC440EP IBM EMAC support · Eugene Surovegin <hidden> · 2005-03-15
440EP FPU patch · McMullan, Jason <hidden> · 2005-03-15
Re: 440EP FPU patch · Kumar Gala <hidden> · 2005-03-15
Re: 440EP FPU patch · Jason McMullan <hidden> · 2005-03-15
Re: 440EP FPU patch · Kumar Gala <hidden> · 2005-03-16
Re: 440EP FPU patch · Tom Rini <hidden> · 2005-03-16
Re: 440EP FPU patch · Kumar Gala <hidden> · 2005-03-16
Re: 440EP FPU patch · Tom Rini <hidden> · 2005-03-16
Re: 440EP FPU patch · Kumar Gala <hidden> · 2005-03-18
Re: 440EP FPU patch · Jason McMullan <hidden> · 2005-03-18
Re: 440EP FPU patch · Tom Rini <hidden> · 2005-03-18
Re: 440EP FPU patch · Wade Farnsworth <hidden> · 2005-03-31
Re: 440EP FPU patch · Tom Rini <hidden> · 2005-03-31
Re: 440EP FPU patch · Kumar Gala <hidden> · 2005-03-31
Re: 440EP FPU patch · Tom Rini <hidden> · 2005-03-31
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PPC440EP SoC and Bamboo board support · Josh Boyer <hidden> · 2005-03-16
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PPC440EP SoC and Bamboo board support · Wade Farnsworth <hidden> · 2005-03-16
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PPC440EP SoC and Bamboo board support · Jason McMullan <hidden> · 2005-03-16
Re: [PATCH 1/3] PPC440EP SoC and Bamboo board support · Wade Farnsworth <hidden> · 2005-03-16

From: Wade Farnsworth <hidden>
Date: 2005-03-16 18:04:19

On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 10:26, Jason McMullan wrote:

Do you need a 'special' toolchain to work around Errata 42 (isync before
blrl) for user-space, or are the kernel-land fixes sufficient?

Yes, this work around also needs to be in gcc.  I know this has been
fixed in MontaVista's toolchain, but I don't know if the work around has
been pushed up to the main gcc tree.

-Wade Farnsworth

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help