Re: build failure for 2.6.11-mm2

right, but if you look back in the pervious -mm builds that past, they also did not have mkImage but still succeeded.

It appear some change is now report the lack of mkImage as a build error.  If this is desired behavior, should we maybe look at having a copy of its source in the kernel tree?

- kumar

On Mar 10, 2005, at 2:26 AM, Eugene Surovegin wrote:

On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:10:04AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
 > Do you have any ideas on what changes occurred in the makefiles to

quoted

cause the uImage related failures:

 >

quoted

http://l4x.org/k/?d=2173

This looks like mkimage is just not present on build host. I don't
think it's included anywhere in kernel tree, so it must be installed
separately.

-- 
 Eugene