On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 02:02:43PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Tom Rini wrote:

quoted

Note that the old SCC enet driver, in linuxppc-2.5 at least is 'OK'.
Not that it couldn't do with a cleanup and netdev person audit, but it's
functional enough for me and my rpxlite to mount a root fs.

sorry to jump into this conversation late -- which "2.6.x" source tree 
is being used here?

As I said, linuxppc-2.5 is where the working driver is right now.

for quite some time, i've just used the linuxppx-2.5 tree at 
ppc.bkbits.net.  but when someone refers to a 2.6.x tree, which one 
specifically is this?  just the latest BK update from www.kernel.org?
or is this a PPC-specific tree?

The only trees that matter here are linuxppc-2.5 (on ppc.bkbits.net) and
linux-2.6 (on linux.bkbits.net).  Everthing else "2.6.x" is a snapshot
of one form or another of the linux-2.6 tree.

-- 
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/