Re: loading the kernel and root FS separately from flash?
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Date: 2004-06-28 10:40:58
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2004-06-29 · Re: loading the kernel and root FS separately from flash? · Robert P. J. Day <hidden>
- 2004-06-29 · Re: loading the kernel and root FS separately from flash? · David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
- 2004-06-28 · Re: loading the kernel and root FS separately from flash? · Robert P. J. Day <hidden>
- 2004-06-28 · Re: loading the kernel and root FS separately from flash? · Gerhard TAEUBL <hidden>
- 2004-06-28 · Re: loading the kernel and root FS separately from flash? · Robert P. J. Day <hidden>
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 12:36 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message [ref] you wrote:quoted
I think it should be OK when it's 4MiB in size. Mount time was far more of a problem in JFFS2 many years ago when people were using the 2.4 kernel. It's a lot faster in 2.6.Is this really a question of which kernel is running? It was my impression that this is merely an issue of which version of the JFFS2 (i. e. MTD) code you are using?
True -- for the moment at least you can drop the JFFS2 development tree into a 2.4 kernel. -- dwmw2 ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/