Re: linuxppc trees, what is going on ?
From: Tom Rini <hidden>
Date: 2004-01-13 17:04:28
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 12:21:43PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Sven Luther writes:quoted
Last year, there was linuxppc_2_4 and the -benh tree. But since december 24, this tree doesn't seem to be touched anymore, and a new linuxppc-2.4 tree is used.The linuxppc_2_4* trees were set up before Marcelo moved over to using BitKeeper to maintain his 2.4 tree. As such, the linuxppc_2_4* trees are not descendents of Marcelo's tree, according to BK, and are updated by applying patches to the linux_2_4 tree, which then get pulled from there into linuxppc_2_4, and from there into linuxppc_2_4_devel and linuxppc_2_4_benh. Now that Marcelo is using BK, this process means extra unnecessary work. Also, there are problems in those trees that have accumulated over the years and that can't be solved in any simple way - there are tag conflicts which keep popping up, and files have been renamed, which gets confusing when changes made upstream to arch/ppc/boot/Makefile get applied by BK to arch/ppc/boot/prep/Makefile in the linuxppc_2_4 tree, since BK thinks they are the same file. The linuxppc-2.4 tree is a descendent of Marcelo's tree, and as such we can pull changes that Marcelo makes in his tree directly into the linuxppc-2.4 tree.quoted
Are we supposed to move to the linuxppc-2.4 tree, and if so, what is the rationale behind this change.The idea of the linuxppc-2.4 tree is that it would stay closer to Marcelo's tree, which would make my job in sending updates to Marcelo easier. In fact, for any substantial body of work which you want to have me send to Marcelo, the best thing is to create a clone of Marcelo's linux-2.4 tree, check your changes into that, and make it available for me to pull from. I can then pull from that and push the changeset(s) into the tree that Marcelo pulls from. That tree can then also be pulled into the linuxppc-2.4 tree to make the changes available there before Marcelo pulls them.quoted
Furthermore, 2.4.24 was released, and the linuxppc-2.4 now contains TAG: v2.4.24, and a bit later there is a Changeset marked as "Import 2.4.24 final tree". There used to be TAGS like TAG: v2.4.23_linuxppc_2_4 which i used to take snapshots for releasing debian powerpc kernel packages. Will there still be those, did they simply get forgotten, should i sync with the v2.4.24 tags, or am i missing something.2.4.24 was a bit strange. Marcelo was doing the 2.4.24-pre series as usual, but then released a 2.4.24 final with just a few changes from 2.4.23, and transferred all the changes that he had been accumulating in 2.4.24-pre into 2.4.25-pre. The linuxppc_2_4* trees haven't been updated to reflect that yet.
FWIW, I'm leaning towards _not_ moving the linuxppc_2_4* and related trees past where they are not just becaue I have this feeling that because of what Marcelo did, it'll be an even larger headache than normal. OTOH, we could just skip 2.4.24 final and move from 2.4.24-pre3 to 2.4.25-pre5 (w/ the mremap fix tossed in). -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/