Christian Kujau wrote:

Tom Rini wrote:

quoted

Ok, here's a better patch.  It's against 2.6.0-test9-BK-latest
(currently bk25).

[...]

i don't have a -bk tree here, so i get a .rej with -test9 and -test10:

evil@sheep:/usr/src/linux-2.6$ cat /data/Incoming/de2104x.c.diff |  \
patch -p1 --dry-run
patching file drivers/net/tulip/de2104x.c
Hunk #6 FAILED at 1569.
1 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
drivers/net/tulip/de2104x.c.rej
evil@sheep:/usr/src/linux-2.6$

but it seems to compile:


   CC      drivers/net/net_init.o
   CC      drivers/net/loopback.o
   CC [M]  drivers/net/tulip/de2104x.o
   CC [M]  drivers/net/tulip/eeprom.o
   CC [M]  drivers/net/tulip/interrupt.o
   CC [M]  drivers/net/tulip/media.o
   CC [M]  drivers/net/tulip/timer.o
   CC [M]  drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.o
   CC [M]  drivers/net/tulip/21142.o
   CC [M]  drivers/net/tulip/pnic.o
   CC [M]  drivers/net/tulip/pnic2.o
   LD [M]  drivers/net/tulip/tulip.o
   CC [M]  drivers/net/tulip/de4x5.o
   LD      drivers/net/built-in.o
   CC [M]  drivers/net/3c59x.o


(compile will finish soon, but have to to sleep now, ...blip..)
Christian.

--
BOFH excuse #20:

divide-by-zero error


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/