Re: "alloc_area_pte: page already exists"

Hi, Matt,

Thank you.

I am not using any io_block_map() call in the code.
However, there are might be other similar causes.
I am still working on it.

If you have more ideas, please let me know.

Regards,

Terry L.

--- Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 07:01:49PM -0700, Xupei
Liang wrote:

quoted

Matt,

It is a custom board with 256MB of memory.

Ahh, ok.  So, what you've done is misconfigured a
mapping in
your custom board port.  It's reporting that you
already have
a pte allocated in the vmalloc area which must be
untouched
so the VM can allocate memory at runtime.

Usually, this is the result of an errant
io_block_map entry
which overlaps the vmalloc area.  Examine the
VMALLOC_START
macro to see how the start of vmalloc space is
calculated.
In your case, (256MB of RAM) the start of vmalloc
space will
be at 0xd1000000 assuming a standard PAGE_OFFSET of
0xc0000000.
If you've mapped something near that virtual address
or somewhere
close above that address then you need to move it.
How much
vmalloc space you need to reserve depends solely on
your specific
application.

In most cases, it's smarter to never use
io_block_map and to
let ioremap() create mappings dynamically so this
sort of thing
doesn't happen. Most modern in-kernel ports try to
not use
io_block_map if at all possible.

Regards,
--
Matt Porter
mporter@kernel.crashing.org

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/