Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2003-07-16
  • (off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
  • Re: ptrace Problem · Kent Borg <hidden> · 2003-07-16

Re: ptrace Problem

From: Kent Borg <hidden>
Date: 2003-07-16 14:26:57

On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:37:51PM +0200, Kenneth Johansson wrote:
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 23:49, Kent Borg wrote:
quoted
Looking at likely source tarballs we have sitting around it seems very
likely that binutils were built from 2.13.2.1, and glibc 2.3.2.  (How
can I be sure?)
binutils binaries usually respond with the version when given -V on the
command line.
Oh!  I thought that was a version of an individual component, but
lordy, nm and objdump both give the same number and it matches the tar
I had guessed we had used.
libc can be checked with objdump -x and checking the Version
definitions.
It lists a series of numbers ranging from 2.0 to 2.2.2.
This should not be a problem gdb dose all the work using ptrace.
Indeed, gdb didn't drag me down into any libraries.
Regarding your gdb problems have you tried with a kernel without bdi2000
support in the kernel.
No, but I will now.


Thanks,

-kb

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help