Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
quoted
quoted
Hi Pantelis
I don't follow you here. Didn't my patch apply cleanly against linuxppc_2_4_devel?
I generated my patch against linuxppc_2_4_devel(I think).
Jocke
Nope.
Fails at hunks #7 and #8.
Don't worry, it's trivial stuff.
Here is enet.c.rej, if you want to check it.
hmm, something is broken here. I can apply my patch to my local copy of
8xx_io/enet.c, BK version 1.24 just fine. Whats your version of enet.c?
Jocke
My version is the head of the BK tree, updated today.
Regards
Pantelis
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/