On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 10:43:27AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:

Cort Dougan writes:

quoted

How about killing the _2_4_devel tree?  When I created it I want it to be a
playground for stabilizing then moving things over to 2_4 failry quickly.
It seems to have become the defacto "want board X, you better use
_2_4_devel" tree.

Now that Marcelo is using BK, what I would really like to do is to
kill both the linuxppc_2_4 and linuxppc_2_4_devel trees and move to a
tree that is a child of Marcelo's linux-2.4 tree.

... but old history? :)

[snip]

...  There is no particular reason that I can see why the 8xx
stuff in 2_4_devel shouldn't go to Marcelo for 2.4.21.

I'll try and get to that too, once finals are over :)

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/