Re: First steps to OCP device model integration
From: David Gibson <hidden>
Date: 2002-08-17 13:44:04
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 08:34:03AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 02:26:05PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:quoted
THe patch below implements the first steps in transitioning the handling of 4xx OCP devices to the unfied device model (in 2.5). So far the code just registers an ocp bus and registers each device described in core_ocp on that bus. The next step is to convert the actual device drivers so that that they register with the unified driver tree rather than through the old ocp_register() mechanism.Hi David, I don't have any concerns about your patch as a starting point, but I'd like to talk about where we are going with driverfs integration of proprietary on-chip buses (4xx and other SoCs). This "first steps" patch shows you registering OCP as a bus with a name of "Onchip Peripheral Bus". This seems to trivialize the bus hierarchy on 4xx and part of the point of driverfs is to see where devices are located in the physical bus structure (since management of them may vary based on their location). I would expect to see "PLB", "OPB", and "ExtBus" registered for 4xx for correctness. They may all use the same bus ops in a reference board implementation (not making use of the EBC in most cases), but somebody could have some FPGA-based peripherals hanging from the EBC which require board-specific PM ops and thus it would be desirable to see and manage at least the External Bus separately in driverfs.
Agreed. I see the use of a single "ocp" bus as a transitional step. My first concern was toget something working - as a proof of concept, and so that we can have working support for ocp devices with an interface that is less broken that the current ocp code. Using a single bus makes it easier to import the devices from the existing core_ocp structure while we port the drivers to the driverfs way of thinking. -- David Gibson | For every complex problem there is a david@gibson.dropbear.id.au | solution which is simple, neat and | wrong. http://www.ozlabs.org/people/dgibson ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/