Re: First steps to OCP device model integration

akuster writes:

I object seriously.

  Some of what you have might be useful.:) OCP is not just for 4xx.  In
fact the name may need to change.  I have been working on overhalling
this interface and testing the ideas before having a review of the
changes.  I am on the hook to Paul and others to get this out in the
open to discuss and am not ready.  So if you could just relax and wait I
would appriciate it.  I would rather see the 2.5 kernel boot on a few
4xx boards

Two points:

- Integrating the OCP stuff into the unified device model (driverfs
  etc.) in 2.5 is essential.

- I really want to have some open discussions about ideas, structures
  etc. for OCP support *before* you have everything fully worked out. :)

Regards,
Paul.

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/