Re: Weird interrupt problem
From: Michel Dänzer <hidden>
Date: 2002-08-16 17:01:23
On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 14:07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
quoted
Today this happened to me the second time: All of a sudden, the USB mouse stopped working. At the same time this appeared in the syslog: Aug 7 17:19:57 tibook kernel: Unhandled interrupt 1d, disabled Plugging the mouse to the other socket worked, but it wouldn't work again in the original one. As you can see in the attached /proc/interrupts, interrupt 29 (=1d) is unknown. Interestingly, interrupt 28 seems to be for the USB socket which stopped working (I think it was the same one when the first problem first occured, might be coincidence though). Was it somehow rewarded for its 100'000th occurence? ;) Seriously, is it possible that the number changed somehow? This wouldn't be all that bad, if the whole system wasn't very sluggish afterwards. When it occured the first time, I had CONFIG_TAU enabled in the kernel, which Ben said might cause the sluggishness at least. But now it's disabled. This is on a TiBook III/667 running 2.4.18-ben0-lotsanicestuff if it matters. The first occurence was with 2.4.19-presomething-ben0. Has anyone experienced anything similar?Really weird. It looks like the openpic is going south. Seriously, looks like a HW problem, that is the interrupt controller starts giving us bogus interrupt numbers. Doesn't sound good at all :(
Well, now the machine is off to Apple to repair PMU problems. Maybe this was a kind of an early warning sign. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/