Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 3 authors, 2002-07-08

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Change how we pick which _kd_mksound to use.

From: Armin <hidden>
Date: 2002-07-08 16:07:39

Paul Mockeries wrote:
Tom Rind writes:
quoted
The following changes how we pick a _kd_mksound.  The problem is that on
some machines, such as IBM405, the default _kd_mksound breaks horribly
due to the inb/outb's attempting to fiddle with timers which don't
exist.  This changes the test which selects either an empty _kd_mksound
or the one in question from __powerpc__ to CONFIG_PPC64 (since from what I
understand, __powerpc__ is defined on ppc64) || (CONFIG_PPC32 &&
CONFIG_6xx).  The CONFIG_6xx test is because these boards are the ones
which tend to have a SuperIO chip, or something else with the timers at
0x61, 0xB6, etc.

The other option would be to define an empty no_kd_mksound or so on
4xx/8xx and then conditionally set kd_mksound to that, but I would
prefer this since we're already doing some preprocessor checks anyhow.
It looks to me as if the CONFIG_REDWOOD should be changed to CONFIG_4XX
to start with and there are no guarantees that the timer will be at the
same locations plus on a pci base 4xx , in*/out* can't br used on local
bus i/o access.
This is one of those "there's got to be a better way" places.  The
CONFIG_PPC32 && CONFIG_6xx test doesn't really capture what we want
much better than the existing __powerpc__ test does.  Testing
CONFIG_PPC32 && CONFIG_ISA might go closer.  I would really rather
that _kd_mksound was provided in the platform-specific files on those
platforms where it applies, though.

Paul.
For 4xx it should be defined at the board level in most cases :)

armin


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help