Re: [PATCH/RFC] Change how we pick which _kd_mksound to use.
From: Armin <hidden>
Date: 2002-07-08 16:07:39
Paul Mockeries wrote:
Tom Rind writes:quoted
The following changes how we pick a _kd_mksound. The problem is that on some machines, such as IBM405, the default _kd_mksound breaks horribly due to the inb/outb's attempting to fiddle with timers which don't exist. This changes the test which selects either an empty _kd_mksound or the one in question from __powerpc__ to CONFIG_PPC64 (since from what I understand, __powerpc__ is defined on ppc64) || (CONFIG_PPC32 && CONFIG_6xx). The CONFIG_6xx test is because these boards are the ones which tend to have a SuperIO chip, or something else with the timers at 0x61, 0xB6, etc. The other option would be to define an empty no_kd_mksound or so on 4xx/8xx and then conditionally set kd_mksound to that, but I would prefer this since we're already doing some preprocessor checks anyhow.
It looks to me as if the CONFIG_REDWOOD should be changed to CONFIG_4XX to start with and there are no guarantees that the timer will be at the same locations plus on a pci base 4xx , in*/out* can't br used on local bus i/o access.
This is one of those "there's got to be a better way" places. The CONFIG_PPC32 && CONFIG_6xx test doesn't really capture what we want much better than the existing __powerpc__ test does. Testing CONFIG_PPC32 && CONFIG_ISA might go closer. I would really rather that _kd_mksound was provided in the platform-specific files on those platforms where it applies, though. Paul.
For 4xx it should be defined at the board level in most cases :) armin ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/