Re: Trivial cleanup in ocp_uart.c
From: Kenneth Johansson <hidden>
Date: 2002-06-27 16:52:37
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 18:23, Scott Anderson wrote:
David Gibson wrote:quoted
Eek, wibble. It still seems somewhat unlikely to me that you'd be changing the peripherals "on the fly" in a real life embedded application. Especially considering that reboots are likely to be much less of an issue on an embedded system than on a big server.
I guess I wouldn't be quite so quick to dismiss this as unlikely, but I must admit, my crystal ball is in the shop this week. It sure would be nice to keep such things in mind as OCP is evolving, though.
As someone who actually work with FPGA chips I can assure everyone that those are always to small even when you pick one that seems insanely large when you start. I have many times been in a situation when is could work quite well to have mutually exclusive subsystem but what has stopped that before is that the chips/software usually do not support partial reconfiguration and you usually can't reconfigure the whole part without disturbing normal functions. -- Kenneth Johansson Ericsson AB Tel: +46 8 404 71 83 Borgafjordsgatan 9 Fax: +46 8 404 72 72 164 80 Stockholm kenneth.johansson@etx.ericsson.se ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/