Re: MPC823E USB controller - delay gates necessary?
From: Josh Horvath <hidden>
Date: 2002-06-07 19:45:11
To follow up on my original message, it appears that the delay gates are indeed required for proper host mode operation on the 823e. Using the PDIUSBP11A transceiver, we measured about 6-8ns of skew between the single ended and differential receive lines. This is apparently too close to the +8ns limit stated in the MPC850 device errata. So you may get a lucky transceiver/processor combo that will work, but most likely you'll need the delay gates on the differential receive pair to get host mode to work reliably. -Josh Josh Horvath wrote:
The device errata for the MPC850 includes the CPM17 bug that states delay gates are necessary on the USB pins. The MPC823E errata sheet does not mention this bug. I recently read the message by Christian Schroeder about getting the USB controller working on the TQM823L board (with an 823E processor). He states that the delay gates are necessary. Is this true? I've got a custom 823E board that doesn't include these gates and I'm having trouble getting the controller working, and it's not totally clear to me if it's a hardware or software problem. Thanks, -Josh
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/