Re: can/should we use gcc 3.1 to compile kernels
From: Tom Rini <hidden>
Date: 2002-06-07 20:19:06
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 03:44:56PM -0400, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
Not too bad warnings-wize excpet for the controlfb.c where it constanly gave a funny warning about "pasting ->".
Sounds right. I think there was a few other things too..
It did this for every occurence of the macro CNTRL_REG which I must admit has two ## which I think gcc was misinterpreting somehow.
Well, isn't: #define x(foo) a_## foo ##_b A semi-common thing, like we do in indirect_pci.c ? Or was it something different?
Other than that just the occaissioanal wanring about unused variables and things like that.
Lots of the USB stuff uses __FUNCTION__ which gcc-3.1 isn't happy about.
I should have saved the build.log
S'alright. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/