Re: [PATCH] Several patches agains linuxppc_devel-2.4.19-pre8
From: Tom Rini <hidden>
Date: 2002-05-16 13:56:43
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:26:33AM +0200, "David M?ller (ELSOFT AG)" wrote:
Tom Rini schrieb:quoted
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:35:55PM +0200, "David M?ller (ELSOFT AG)" wrote:quoted
The attached patch fixes the following issues:Looks good, except: Don't #ifdef externs, if they aren't used it's OK. Since this code only has to work in recent'ish kernels (in reality only 'current' kernels) don't bother with the #ifdef MODULE_LICENSE ... #endif Just use it.I have copied the MODULE_LICENSE stuff from another driver. Does anybody knows if this feature is tagged to be a remove candidate in future kernels and/or in the modutils?
Unfortunately, no. I think other drivers do it for backwards compatibility, which we don't have to worry about.
Another question: I've noticed that (at least) the following files have their executable bit set, although they are simple C source files. ./include/asm-ppc/ppc405_dma.h ./arch/ppc/kernel/ppc405_dma.c ./arch/ppc/kernel/ppc405_pci.c ./arch/ppc/kernel/ppc4xx_setup.c ./arch/ppc/platforms/walnut.c ./arch/ppc/platforms/cpc700_pic.c On the other hand, the PPCBoot kernel packer script in ./arch/ppc/boot/utils/mkimage.wrapper have the exec bit cleared. Is it a bit task to fix this?
I assume you ment big. And no, I've just fixed these. Thanks. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/