Re: ibm_ocp_enet.c - PHY implementation requirements?
From: Armin <hidden>
Date: 2002-05-07 15:49:23
Allen Curtis wrote:
We have an 405GP design, very similar to the Walnut LSP. One of the major differences is that we have a BroadCom 9-port switch instead of a dedicated PHY for Ethernet. Supporting the switch is much easier than a dedicated PHY because you can always assume: 100Mb, Full-Duplex and you do not have to handle disconnect and mode change interrupts. The problem is that the OCP Ethernet implementation has become much more complex and it is not obvious what must be supported when adding a new interface and what could be a stub. (and its expected result) Another issue is that the switch supports both the MII and SPI interfaces. These are mutually exclusive, determined by first access to the device. Our design requires the use of the SPI interface. All currently supported PHY are MII, which is expected. Do you forsee any problems using SPI within ibm_ocp_phy.c? TIA
There are a few stubs for the zmii bridge The MII functions can most likly be placed into it's own file and you might want to think about creating a spi.c file for its implimentation. This would allow us to have them be complied in depending on what mode is configured. The questions is can we come up with a common api to mii & spi? armin ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/