Re: Status on 405GP i2c driver
From: Armin <hidden>
Date: 2002-04-24 18:23:44
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2002-04-24 · Re: Status on 405GP i2c driver · andrew may <hidden>
- 2002-04-24 · Re: Status on 405GP i2c driver · andrew may <hidden>
- 2002-04-23 · Re: Status on 405GP i2c driver · Matt Porter <hidden>
- 2002-04-23 · Re: Status on 405GP i2c driver · andrew may <hidden>
- 2002-04-23 · Re: Status on 405GP i2c driver · Armin Kuster <hidden>
andrew may wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 07:47:33AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:quoted
It's not a good idea to merge the i2c-2.6.3 support into 2_4_devel.It seemed that Armins patch to the i2c list was against 2.6.3 so I deciede to merge that in before I merged in Armin's patch. I started doing the merge before you added in the files so that made things interesting. Unless you think 2.6.3 has some new bugs I see no reason to back out the changes in my tree.
Yes the patch sent to the i2c mailing list was against 2.6.3 since thats their latest version. The *.c & *.h files should be the same in both trees armin ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/