Re: as question
From: Dan Brennan <hidden>
Date: 2002-04-18 20:40:03
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2002-04-19 · Re: as question · Gabriel Paubert <hidden>
- 2002-04-18 · as question · Dan Brennan <hidden>
From: Dan Brennan <hidden>
Date: 2002-04-18 20:40:03
You're right, I objdump'd on the wrong object. They are okay. Still trying to figure out why execution stops immediately following the RFI. Thanks. David Edelsohn wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Dan Brennan writes:Dan> In arch/ppc/kernel/head.S the following code segment exists: Dan> lis r0,start_here@h Dan> ori r0,r0,start_here@l Dan> However, when I do objdump on head.o this is what appears: Dan> 94: 3c 00 00 00 lis r0,0 Dan> 98: 60 00 00 00 nop Dan> It appears that the code which loads the address of the label start_here Dan> does not get assembled correctly. Is this observation correct? What do those instructions look like in the final executable after the link-editor has statically substituted the address of the start_here symbol? David
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/