Re: EV-64260-BP & GT64260 bi_recs
From: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Date: 2002-03-27 18:40:11
From: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Date: 2002-03-27 18:40:11
Yeah, that's right, I messed up. So what should be done for the nested ones? What is we use the BI_DEVICE as a quasi-BI_FIRST and then add a BI_LAST to each nested one? This is what it would look like:
Any reason why BI_LAST has those 4 bytes of data set to 0, why not just BI_LAST size=0 and no data ? Ben. ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/