Re: EV-64260-BP & GT64260 bi_recs
From: Wolfgang Denk <hidden>
Date: 2002-03-20 18:06:07
In message [ref] you wrote:
Just what is wrong with my solution of BI_GT64260_ETH_CFG, BI_8260_ETH_CFG, BI_8XX_ETH_CFG, etc?
I don't think you need to pass different information around; in fact, all these probably need exactly the same information... There is no inherent difference between the ethernet interfaces on a 8xx or on a 82xx. But both the 8xx and 82xx come with two pretty much different onchip ethernet controllers (SCC/FEC on 8xx, SCC/FCC on 82xx). So should we have BI_8XX_SCC_ETH_CFG, BI_8XX_FCC_ETH_CFG, BI_8260_SCC_ETH_CFG, BI_8260_FCC_ETH_CFG, ...? Certainly not. I don't know the GT64260 that well; what makes it's ethernet interface so much different from all other devices that it cannot share a common BI_ETH_CFG? Wolfgang Denk -- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd@denx.de "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim" - Edsgar W. Dijkstra ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/