Thread (4 messages) flat view 4 messages, 2 authors, 2002-03-14

Re: Nasty ATI/tulip interaction

From: Michel Lanners <hidden>
Date: 2002-03-13 17:59:19

Hi David,

Sorry for replying late; was on holiday...

On  27 Feb, this message from David A. Gatwood echoed through cyberspace:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, David A. Gatwood wrote:
quoted
Weird issue.  I finally got the PowerBase 180, and I've attempted to move
my Linux system from the G4 over to it.  I'm running a heavily patched
2.2.21-pre2 kernel.  It includes the PCI fixup patches, Promise Ultra
ATA/66 patches, and a few (possibly ppc-specific) bug fixes
[ in IDE ].
Any specific reason to stay with a 2.2 kernel? I can run 2.4.18 mainline
straight-Linus (sorry, straight-Marcello) on my 7600, with a Promise as
well.

2.4 kenels are a lot faster on PPC as well...
Thanks to Ben Herrenschmidt, I've gotten it back to the point where I have
a console, but enabling the ethernet card still hoses the ATI output.

On a hunch, I downloaded, compiled, and installed pciutils, and I found
the problem....  The tulip card and the motherboard VGA got assigned the
same I/O ports address (0xf2000400).  No idea how that happened, but it's
quite consistent.
Definitely a reason to move to 2.4 with the dynamic resource allocation.
That one will catch conflicts (modulo bugs like a chip not decoding as
precise as it says...).
Looks like something broken.  I'd try without Michel Lanners' PCI fixup
patches, but I can't boot without them.
Use 2.4 ;-) Should boot, and you can get rid of my patches :-))
I'm trying to track down what's
breaking, but it isn't obvious.  I've tried to duplicate the code that
remaps planb to remap the ethernet device, but I'm getting nowhere fast.
It's attempting to do the remap, and it is successfully changing the
kernel's notion of the device address, but it looks like for some reason,
the change isn't happening in the controller itself, since I'm getting a
machine check when I actually try to access the device now.  I'm probably
doing something wrong.
You sure you did everything required? You need to write the new address
back into the device's control registers, and you need to enable IO/Mem
space response before the device would repond. A non-responding device
can give you a machine check.
I'm giving up for the night, but when I get back to this tomorrow night,
does anyone have any suggestions on how to change the PCI addy of the
ethernet card?
I'm repeting myself, but try 2.4 ?
BTW, this doesn't work:
[snip]

Hmmm.. should have worked, though. Didn't see any obvious errors. Try a
2.4 kernel (did I say that before?), if that fails also, I'd say you
have a hardware bug somewhere that needs to be worked around....

Cheers

Michel

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michel Lanners                 |  " Read Philosophy.  Study Art.
23, Rue Paul Henkes            |    Ask Questions.  Make Mistakes.
L-1710 Luxembourg              |
email   mlan@cpu.lu            |
http://www.cpu.lu/~mlan        |                     Learn Always. "


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help